![]() ![]() Desktop clients for Windows and macOS are easy to use for picking out files and folders.įrom the web interface, the files you've uploaded can be viewed, and downloads can be requested. However, they do the job well enough and the software has plenty of useful features scattered throughout – such as the backup filter that lets you pick out files with a particular filename or using a particular extension. The reality is that these aren't the most modern or the slickest interfaces you're ever going to come across. Some of the software stylings are the same between both of these cloud storage services. However, Zoolz offers both cold and hot storage, while Polarbackup sticks to cold storage only (hence the name, we’d guess). If you think that the Polarbackup interface looks familiar, you would be correct as it is similar to another backup solution Zoolz, and the two services are run by the same company. (Image credit: Polarbackup) Polarbackup interface It starts at the equivalent of £1.42 per month paid annually for 100GB, however the 1TB available for £5 per month, paid annually, is better value. This is only available on a browser - not the desktop client - and offers a degree of collaboration with file sharing. This helps to save bandwidth if you rely on your Internet connection for other tasks, not to mention the time saved.Īrguably more usable is Polarbackup’s Instant Vault, which offers a more versatile cloud storage system. We especially like the incremental backup feature, which means that only new or modified files are uploaded. If you only need to back up certain files, you can set Polarbackup to run a selective backup on particular file types, like Microsoft Office files, videos or desktop files, for example. There's also an option of limiting bandwidth through the desktop client if you need to, or conversely, to enable multithreaded upload which promises faster upload speeds by consuming your entire bandwidth. With the desktop clients installed, backups can be run at set intervals (anywhere from every 12 hours to every 7 days), or on a custom schedule. We like the lack of limits on users, servers or file sizes, and no additional charge for data restoration (you'll just have to wait a few hours to get it back). There are also business packages, and you get extra options for user management, setting data policies, digging into activity logs and handling standards compliance. ![]() File versioning gets support also, allowing you to save multiple versions of the same file and then choose which one you need to get back when running a restore. If something disastrous were to happen to your computer, you get all your files and folders back again, but you just won't be able to get them back again right away. The reality of cold storage is when you need to restore a file, it takes between 3 and 12 hours according to Polarbackup. ![]() In short, it's fast, simple to use and is quick to configure. After setting it up on your computer, it'll copy all the files you want to the web – including those on external drives and network drives – IMHO, paying USD 49 for 1TB of (useful) capacity was still cheaper than an equivalent physical HDD, with all the advantages of cloud storage.As previously noted, Polarbackup is a cold storage solution, which is designed for data you want to back up somewhere, but that you don't need to access very often. I make backup of all my PC data to both cloud&NAS (hybrid mode), and backup the rest of the NAS itself to the cloud as well.Įven though I was on time to get a refund, I decided to keep the deal. However, the client works pretty well for me. Any dedicated user will learn the quirks of the software better than their staff in no more than a couple of weeks. Their support is quick but the responses usually lack professionalism and dexterity, and are often plain wrong. This turns hot storage virtually useless for any serious application other than sharing a few pictures to your mom. ![]() Neither via WebDAV, nor rsync access, nothing. They don’t provide any means of mapping hot storage locally. My experience has been similarly frustrating as that of I expected a full sync client for both cold and hot storage, but the latter does not exist. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |